DarwinCatholic: The Surrogate’s Tale

About five years into the program, the dormitories were built. It was a natural offshoot of the work, and a work of charity as well — more and more women in need were applying to be part of the program.

And of course no one was obliged or compelled to be a Benefactor — the requirements were clearly spelled out, and there were counseling requirements to be met before a woman was accepted into the program.

Terminology was set in the early stages. The clients were called “Sponsors”. Advocacy groups pushed for the term ‘parents’, but the language of parenthood was fraught in cases where there were anywhere between two and five parties involved in the development of the fetus, and the directors thought it best avoided.


The term for the surrogates had gone through many evolutions. “Surrogate” itself was considered too clinical, “Carrier” was too demeaning, and “Mother” was, off course, right out. Eventually a cadre of outside consultants settled upon “Benefactor” as striking just the right note — women helping others, giving the precious gift of parenthood to others.

Source: DarwinCatholic: The Surrogate’s Tale

Go read the rest. *shudder*

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “DarwinCatholic: The Surrogate’s Tale”

      1. I wouldn’t be surprised if that if the case overseas. I mean nobody thinks of the horrifying implications of ‘what happens to the other baby brought to term’ so why would anyone wonder about the commoditization of the womb? Desirable genes after all…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s